Financial Information
Financial Reports
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 Declaration as Draft 2016 06 25 (PDF, 517 Kb)
Audit of Seaton Parish Council Accounts Declaration as Draft by the Clerk to the Council
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 Notes on Public Inspection of Accounts 2016 05 25 (PDF, 3.2 Mb)
Annual Return year ended 31 March 2016
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 Internal Audit Report 2016 05 25 (PDF, 2 Mb)
Internal Audit Report of the Audited SPC Accounts for 2015/16
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 Section 1 2016 05 25 (PDF, 8 Mb)
Section 1 of the Audited SPC Accounts for 2015/16
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 Section 2 2016 05 25 (PDF, 8 Mb)
Section 2 of the Audited SPC Accounts for 2015/16
Seaton Parish Council Statement of Accounts 2015/16 2016 07 21 (MS Excel, 32 Kb)
Seaton Parish Council Statement of Accounts 2015/16
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 List of Expenditure in Excess of £100 2016 05 25 (PDF, 37 Kb)
Audit of SPC Accounts for 2015/16 List of Expenditure on Items in Excess of £100
Seaton Parish Council Fixed Asset Schedule 2015/16 2016 07 21 (MS Word, 43 Kb)
Seaton Parish Council Fixed Asset Schedule 2015/16
Precept
The Precept is the element of your Council Tax that is paid to Seaton Parish Council.
Every year, the Parish Council draws up budgets and calculates how much money it needs for the next Financial Year. These are then submitted to Rutland County Council for their approval. For 2017/18, Seaton Parish Council recommended that the Precept should be set at £3600. This would meet the higher costs for the mandatory website and additional grounds maintenance charges.
Budget
Further details of the Parish Council's budgets for the 2017/18 Financial Year can be obtained from the Parish Office.
Pay Multiple
Council's are required by the Government's Transparency Code (2015) to publish Pay Multiples. This is the ratio of the taxable pay of the highest paid officer in relation to the median taxable pay of the council's work force.
Seaton Parish Council has only one salaried employee, therefore this ruling is not applicable.